What is Incremental Static Regeneration (ISR)

Contents show

Back when static site generators (SSGs) like Jekyll were dominant, the mental model was simple: build once, deploy, serve forever. But that model crests in difficulty when your content changes often or your site scales. You either schedule frequent rebuilds (which get slow) or shift to more dynamic patterns (SSR).

Incremental Static Regeneration (ISR) emerged as a hybrid answer: “How can we keep many benefits of static generation (performance, caching, low server load) while still permitting content to refresh without a full rebuild?” This concept—popularized by frameworks like Next.js—lets you re-generate pages on demand or at intervals, selectively, not globally. It bridges SSG and SSR in a way that feels pragmatic.

Understanding ISR is critical in modern web architecture because it gives you a middle ground: you don’t have to commit fully to SSR (with all its server costs) just to keep your pages fresh. Instead, you can have mostly static, but selectively dynamic pages.

What is ISR and how it works

Incremental Static Regeneration (ISR) is a rendering strategy that lets you generate static HTML at build time (as with SSG), but also refresh pages later—on demand or after a given time—without needing to rebuild the entire site.

ISR works via a kind of stale-while-revalidate caching and regeneration model: when a request arrives for a page, the system can serve the existing cached static HTML immediately; meanwhile (or when a threshold is passed), it can regenerate the page in the background with fresh data. Once regeneration completes, subsequent requests use the new version.

Here’s a flow chart to illustrate:

flowchart LR
  A["User requests /page"] --> B["Check if page is cached (static build or prior regeneration)"]
  B --> C{"Is cache valid?"}
  C -- "yes" --> D["Serve cached HTML immediately"]
  C -- "no / expired" --> E["Serve cached HTML"]
  C -- "no / expired" --> F["Trigger regeneration in background"]
  F --> G["Fetch fresh data, render new HTML"]
  G --> H["Replace cache for /page"]

Key points in that flow:

The user doesn’t wait for regeneration. They get something fast (the cached version).
Regeneration is isolated per-page; it doesn’t force a full rebuild.
You control when regeneration should occur (via configuration and threshold logic).

Frameworks that support ISR often expose parameters like revalidate or allow “on-demand” regeneration (e.g. via API hooks).

Implementation & example (Next.js style)

In Next.js, ISR is a built-in feature when you use getStaticProps (or its newer equivalents) with a revalidate parameter. That tells Next.js: “You can regenerate this page every N seconds.”

Here’s a minimal example (for a blog post page):

// pages/posts/[slug].js

export async function getStaticProps({ params }) {
  const post = await fetchPostBySlug(params.slug);
  return {
    props: { post },
    revalidate: 60,  // next regeneration allowed after 60 seconds
  };
}

export async function getStaticPaths() {
  const posts = await fetchAllPostSlugs();
  return {
    paths: posts.map(p => ({ params: { slug: p.slug } })),
    fallback: 'blocking'
  };
}

export default function PostPage({ post }) {
  return (
    <article>
      <h1>{post.title}</h1>
      <div dangerouslySetInnerHTML={{ __html: post.contentHtml }} />
    </article>
  );
}

// pages/posts/[slug].js

export async function getStaticProps({ params }) {
  const post = await fetchPostBySlug(params.slug);
  return {
    props: { post },
    revalidate: 60,  // next regeneration allowed after 60 seconds
  };
}

export async function getStaticPaths() {
  const posts = await fetchAllPostSlugs();
  return {
    paths: posts.map(p => ({ params: { slug: p.slug } })),
    fallback: 'blocking'
  };
}

export default function PostPage({ post }) {
  return (
    <article>
      <h1>{post.title}</h1>
      <div dangerouslySetInnerHTML={{ __html: post.contentHtml }} />
    </article>
  );
}

revalidate: 60 means Next.js will consider regenerating that page after 60 seconds.
fallback: 'blocking' means that if a requested path isn’t yet generated, the request will wait while the page is generated (and then be cached).

You can also use on-demand ISR: explicitly trigger regeneration (via API routes or webhooks) rather than waiting for time expiry.

Advantages and trade-offs

Why you’d use ISR

Scalability with freshness: Large sites (thousands+ pages) benefit because you don’t rebuild everything whenever one page changes.
Fast responses: Most requests deliver prebuilt HTML quickly, preserving performance benefits of SSG.
Content updates without full redeploy: You can push updates to certain pages (e.g. new blog post, product changes) without rebuilding the entire site.
Better resource utilization: Because regeneration happens per-page, server cost is bounded; hot pages regenerate first.

What you must watch out for

Stale window / consistency: Until regeneration finishes, users may see outdated content. If you aggressively regenerate, it may cause load or race conditions.
Concurrency / locking: In high-traffic scenarios, multiple triggers might try regenerating the same page simultaneously, unless carefully handled.
Complex caching logic: You’ll need to think about cache headers, invalidation, stale-while-revalidate semantics, and fallback behavior.
Cold paths / cold starts: Pages that were never built (or used) may incur latency when first accessed (if fallback is blocking).
Infrastructure constraints: On static hosts that only accept fully static output (no server-side logic), ISR may be impossible.
Memory / disk constraints: Caching many regenerated pages may raise storage or memory pressure, especially in serverless or containerized deployments.

When and how to apply ISR in real projects

Use cases that benefit from ISR

Blogs or editorial sites with frequent updates (but not constant).
E-commerce product pages: many pages don’t change often, but some do (price, stock).
Documentation with versioning, where some sections are stable but others get edits.
Hybrid content: mostly static, but with occasional dynamic refresh (e.g. status, metrics).

Strategy tips and best practices

Choose sensible revalidate intervals (e.g., 30s, 60s, 300s) based on content volatility.
Use on-demand regeneration for critical updates (e.g., via webhooks from CMS).
Use fallback strategies (blocking, true, or false) based on user experience trade-offs.
Monitor regeneration load: log how often regeneration triggers, how long it takes, error rates.
Guard regeneration logic: ensure failed fetches don’t corrupt the cache or leave bad HTML.
Use server or edge caching in front of your regenerate-enabled handler to reduce duplicate triggers.

While ISR shares core ideas with SSG (pre-rendering) and SSR (freshness), it stands out by decoupling rebuilds and giving you “static with revalidation” capabilities. If earlier you considered SSG or SSR, think of ISR as a bridge to ease that tension.

Summary & developer takeaway

Incremental Static Regeneration is a design that gives you the best of static and dynamic: you retain high performance and caching for most pages, yet permit selective regeneration so content doesn’t stay stale. As a web developer, you’ll want to understand when to regenerate, how to guard concurrency, how to balance freshness vs cost, and how fallback modes shape user experience. Apply ISR where content changes, but not too rapidly—or where total rebuilds become burdensome.

Was this helpful?

Thanks for your feedback!